Let’s talk

Digital Human

Expertise.
Multiplied.

Specialist AI trained on your experts.
Built to work through your existing applications,
inside your environment. Under your control.

Explore a pilotWatch the demo

ACTUAL APP RECORDING · 55 SECONDS · SILENT

See Digital Human at work.

Synthetic-data demo. Form filling and actual reasoning, together. Selected moments are accelerated. The claim remains under review.

Explore the product
Learn the judgment. Scale the capability.↓
NEUROLOGIC AI / OUR CLIENTS

Experience across
exceptional companies.

TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS

Our technology ecosystem.

WHERE EXPERIENCE MATTERS

A field can be filled.
And still need a second look.

Read intakeComplete formReview claim
THE INTAKE SAYSSevere migraine
headaches
THE FORM SAYSUnknownThese values disagree.

Verify the source before continuing.The judgment is recognizing the conflict—and knowing what to check.

Adapted from the recorded disability-claims Q&A. No claim update is shown.

01 / THE HUMAN ADVANTAGE

The steps
are written down.
The judgment
isn’t.

Your best people spot what the usual answer misses. Digital Human is designed to learn from that judgment.

See what that means
02 / FOLLOW ONE DECISION

The field is only
part of the story.

One insurance question.
Follow the reasoning behind the next step.

Skip to the evidence
ONE DECISION01 / 05
Intake
Claim form
Next step
A condition. An unknown field.Two sources conflict · recorded Q&A
01Notice

One claim. Two different signals.

The intake summary names a specific condition. The claim form says Unknown. The recorded question asks what should happen next.

Anonymized disability-claims Q&A · recorded model response
ONE CLAIM / A SOURCE CONFLICTRECORDED Q&A
01 / INTAKE SUMMARY

Severe migraine
headaches.

Specific condition recorded
02 / CLAIM FORM

Unknown.

Conflicting form value
THE QUESTIONWhich source should guide the next step?

Adapted from the recorded question and answer. Identifying details removed.

02Resolve

Start with the source, not the empty field.

The recorded answer begins by checking the valid intake summary and reconciling the conflicting condition information.

A reasoning response · no record was updated in this Q&A
ONE CLAIM / A SOURCE CONFLICTRECORDED Q&A
01 / INTAKE SUMMARY

Severe migraine
headaches.

Specific condition recorded
02 / CLAIM FORM

Unknown.

Conflicting form value
THE RECORDED ANSWERVerify the intake. Reconcile the conflict.

Adapted from the recorded question and answer. Identifying details removed.

03Connect

The next step depends on another record.

The absence and disability components are not yet synchronized. The response calls for confirming that dependency before continuing to disability review.

Source-backed sequence · verification still required
ONE CLAIM / A SOURCE CONFLICTRECORDED Q&A
ONE CLAIM · TWO COMPONENTS

Shared information
must agree first.

Required checks before disability review
Shared fieldsAbsenceDisability
DatesCheck sourceConfirm match
PlansCheck sourceConfirm match
CHECK PENDINGConfirm synchronization

The recorded answer places this check before disability review.

Then continue to
Disability review

Dates and plans are shared fields in the documented workflow. Synchronization is a prerequisite, not a completed action here.

Adapted from the recorded question and answer. Identifying details removed.

04Learn

This is the kind of context a specialist needs.

The product is designed to learn from approved demonstrations that preserve context, decisions and outcomes—not just a list of clicks.

Learning concept · this Q&A is not a human training trace
01 / AN APPROVED DEMONSTRATION

Keep the decision
with its context.

  1. ContextWhat did the expert see?

    Sources, current state and the exception.

  2. DecisionWhy this next step?

    The action, its reason and any correction.

  3. OutcomeWhat happened next?

    The result that makes the decision testable.

A learning trace preserves the relationship between all three.

PRODUCT CONCEPT · APPROVED DEMONSTRATIONS

05Test

Then give it work it has never seen.

Keep validation separate from training. Measure decisions, errors and escalation before expanding the specialist’s responsibility.

Evaluation principle · no insurance accuracy claim
HOW THE EVIDENCE IS BUILT

Keep the test separate.

LEARNING MATERIALApproved
demonstrations

Context · decision · outcome

Separate sets
EVALUATION MATERIALHeld-out
tasks

Defined success · recorded errors

REPORTING CHECKLIST
  • What was tested
  • What the comparison used
  • What passed—and what did not
  • Where the claim stops

Evaluation design principle. The engineering study uses held-out circuits; each published evaluation states its own method.

PRODUCT CONCEPT · HELD-OUT VALIDATION

ONE CLAIM / A SOURCE CONFLICTRECORDED Q&A
01 / INTAKE SUMMARY

Severe migraine
headaches.

Specific condition recorded
02 / CLAIM FORM

Unknown.

Conflicting form value
THE QUESTIONWhich source should guide the next step?

Adapted from the recorded question and answer. Identifying details removed.

The first three scenes adapt a recorded model answer. The learning and testing scenes explain the intended method. Explore the source-backed Q&A ↗

THE PRODUCT / SEE THE WORK

One intelligence.
More ways to work.

Learn from expert work. Bring answers and their evidence to the team, with people controlling the next action.

Explore the product
ACTUAL APP RECORDING00:55 / SILENT HIGHLIGHTS
01 / Verify coverage

The policy coverage is checked before the claim is registered.

A silent 54.5-second highlights cut using synthetic demo data. Selected sequences play at 2× speed; form recovery and the expanded reasoning have time to read. The full application and reasoning panel remain visible together. Pause or use the chapters to inspect a moment. The claim is registered and under review, not approved or paid.

Read the scene overview
  1. Verify coverage. The policy coverage is checked before the claim is registered.
  2. Fill the form. The application fills with claim details while the actual reasoning trail remains alongside it.
  3. Recover the amount. An edited amount is corrected back to 2,500. Watch the recovery and the remaining fields.
  4. Add a task. The registered claim appears with New status. A client-note task is added.
  5. Write the note. The client note and expanded reasoning show the work and its explanation in the same frame.
  6. Confirm the outcome. The reasoning records completion. The confirmation email keeps the claim in New status for review.
01 / Building

Capture Agent

For the expert

02 / Planned

Ask Companion

For the team

03 / Planned

Variance Map

For operations leaders

04 / In development

Operator Console

For operations & compliance

Specialist training has been demonstrated in focused evaluations. Product tools are in development or planned. The film uses synthetic data.

TECHNOLOGY / THE METHOD

Built on a foundation.
Defined by your expertise.

Approved expert work and compliance rules shape a specialist for one workflow. Separate, unseen work tests its learning.

Explore the technology
THE INTENDED MODEL ARCHITECTURE
03Your Digital Human

Trained on your expertise, inside your environment

02Vertical world model

Industry workflows, rules and exceptions

01Open foundation

The starting point for specialization

Read about the filed method
03 / REPORTED EVALUATIONS

Now, look at
the evidence.

The idea, illustrated.
The capability, tested.

THE EVIDENCE01 / 03
9/10
Held-out circuits wonSpecialist with frontier fallback · internal evaluation
01 / ENGINEERING

Ten unseen circuits. Nine wins.

A specialist-led system won on 9 of 10 held-out circuits against a frontier baseline, with equal iteration budgets.

Internal evaluation · specialist with frontier fallbackInside the evaluation
ANALOG CIRCUIT OPTIMIZATIONMEASURED
9/10held-out circuits won
Equal iteration budgets136 / 146 targets met

Specialist with frontier fallback. Targets met determine wins; external tokens break ties. Internal evaluation.

02 / THE STARTING POINT

First, establish the baseline.

Before specialist training, the base model achieved 50% procedural accuracy on the enterprise process evaluation.

Same model · enterprise process knowledge
ENTERPRISE PROCESS KNOWLEDGEMEASURED
50%before specialist training
The same untrained base model52 questions · 156 blind judgments

Enterprise billing process. Internally designed, LLM-judged evaluation. Not insurance execution accuracy. Internal evaluation.

03 / AFTER SPECIALIST TRAINING

The same model. A deeper understanding.

Procedural accuracy reached 88% after training: an improvement of 38 percentage points over the 50% baseline.

52 questions · 156 blind LLM judgmentsRead the method
ENTERPRISE PROCESS KNOWLEDGEMEASURED
88%after specialist training
+38 percentage points52 questions · 156 blind judgments

Enterprise billing process. Internally designed, LLM-judged evaluation. Not insurance execution accuracy. Internal evaluation.

ANALOG CIRCUIT OPTIMIZATIONMEASURED
9/10held-out circuits won
Equal iteration budgets136 / 146 targets met

Specialist with frontier fallback. Targets met determine wins; external tokens break ties. Internal evaluation.

Explore all results, methods and limits
A DIFFERENT COST STRUCTURE

Specialize the intelligence.
Change the economics.

Understand the comparison
72%fewer external
billed tokens

Engineering comparison. Relative token use.

16×lower cost in the
reported comparison

Our build, execution hardware and management versus frontier API token costs.

Separate, company-reported token and cost comparisons. Results depend on workload and assumptions. Savings are not guaranteed.

FROM THE EVALUATION / ENTERPRISE BILLING

The difference is
knowing this workflow.

Three questions from the evaluation.
Follow the rule, the decision and the difference in each answer.

BILLING / THE DECISION01 / 03
Charge entry
Memo created
Record verdict
Keep the valid work.Permitted sequence · no reversal required
01 / Work already done

Should valid work be undone?

A biller has created the debit memo before recording the billability verdict. Must the work be reversed?

THE DOCUMENTED RULE

This process allows charge entry and memo creation before the verdict is recorded.

Adapted from evaluation question Q3. The source process, rather than a general best-practice assumption, determines the answer.

Specialist: Keep the valid work. Record the required verdict without reversing and recreating the memo.

Frontier chatbot: Incorrectly treats the permitted sequence as a violation.

Untrained base model: Also calls it a violation and adds an unsupported reversal procedure.

THE SPECIALIST’S ANSWER

Keep the valid work.

  1. Charge entry
  2. Memo created
  3. Record verdict

Permitted sequence · no reversal needed

Keep the valid work. Record the required verdict without reversing and recreating the memo.

THE SAME QUESTION. TWO OTHER ANSWERS.
FRONTIER CHATBOT

Incorrectly treats the permitted sequence as a violation.

UNTRAINED BASE MODEL

Also calls it a violation and adds an unsupported reversal procedure.

02 / A missing note

Missing does not always mean wrong.

An invoice row has completion details but no billability note. Does that prove a required check was skipped?

THE DOCUMENTED RULE

The fixed/maintenance contract path skips that note by design. Other contract paths still require their checks.

Adapted from evaluation question Q7B. This is a specific contract exception, not a rule that missing notes are harmless.

Specialist: Identifies the documented contract exception and checks which branch applies.

Frontier chatbot: Recognizes a possible exception, but does not identify the documented contract branch.

Untrained base model: Invents a note-overwrite explanation and an unsupported lookup.

THE SPECIALIST’S ANSWER

Know which branch applies.

IFFixed / maintenance

Note skipped by design

OTHERWISEOther contract paths

Follow the required checks

Identifies the documented contract exception and checks which branch applies.

THE SAME QUESTION. TWO OTHER ANSWERS.
FRONTIER CHATBOT

Recognizes a possible exception, but does not identify the documented contract branch.

UNTRAINED BASE MODEL

Invents a note-overwrite explanation and an unsupported lookup.

03 / Approval pending

A price discrepancy stays pending.

The verbal quote is $450, while the signed purchase order says $380. What must happen before $450 can be invoiced?

THE DOCUMENTED RULE

Verify the disputed rate against the purchase order, quote the corrected amount, wait for customer approval, and record the awaiting-approval state.

Adapted from evaluation question Q10. The amounts are test-prompt values. No recovered revenue or production transaction is claimed.

Specialist: Requires written approval tied to the case before invoicing $450; holds the higher amount and records the waiting state.

Frontier chatbot: Gives the authorization principle, but omits the concrete hold-state record.

Untrained base model: Adds compliance and system gates that are not in the documented process.

THE SPECIALIST’S ANSWER

Hold the higher amount.

SIGNED PURCHASE ORDER$380
HIGHER AMOUNT$450

Written approval required before invoicing $450

Requires written approval tied to the case before invoicing $450; holds the higher amount and records the waiting state.

THE SAME QUESTION. TWO OTHER ANSWERS.
FRONTIER CHATBOT

Gives the authorization principle, but omits the concrete hold-state record.

UNTRAINED BASE MODEL

Adds compliance and system gates that are not in the documented process.

THE SPECIALIST’S ANSWER

Keep the valid work.

  1. Charge entry
  2. Memo created
  3. Record verdict

Permitted sequence · no reversal needed

Keep the valid work. Record the required verdict without reversing and recreating the memo.

THE SAME QUESTION. TWO OTHER ANSWERS.
FRONTIER CHATBOT

Incorrectly treats the permitted sequence as a violation.

UNTRAINED BASE MODEL

Also calls it a violation and adds an unsupported reversal procedure.

Internal, blind, LLM-judged evaluation. Responses are summarized and anonymized; this tested process reasoning, not production execution.

Explore the evaluation and its limits
YOUR KNOWLEDGE. YOUR ENVIRONMENT.

As capability grows,
control stays with you.

One workflow. Your own environment.
Designed for VPC or on-premise deployment.

YOUR BOUNDARY01 / 03
Knowledge
Specialist
Review gate
Your knowledge stays inside.Intended architecture · VPC / on-premise
01 / YOUR KNOWLEDGE

The learning starts inside.

Approved expert demonstrations provide the context for one workflow. Your knowledge stays within your enterprise boundary.

No pooled customer corpus.
CUSTOMER SECURITY BOUNDARY

The knowledge stays
in your environment.

YOUR VPC / ON-PREMISE
  1. Approved knowledge

    Visible capture and local privacy handling.

  2. Customer specialist

    Train and serve inside your environment.

  3. Review gate

    Your policies determine when a person must decide.

Permitted application action

Raw capturesRemoved after required processing.

External reuseOnly audited abstracted structure may inform synthetic data.

Intended architecture and controls. Customer instance data is not pooled.

02 / YOUR SPECIALIST

Capability grows. The boundary holds.

A specialist learns the bounded task, designed to run in your VPC or on-premise environment.

One workflow · your deployment environment
CUSTOMER SECURITY BOUNDARY

The knowledge stays
in your environment.

YOUR VPC / ON-PREMISE
  1. Approved knowledge

    Visible capture and local privacy handling.

  2. Customer specialist

    Train and serve inside your environment.

  3. Review gate

    Your policies determine when a person must decide.

Permitted application action

Raw capturesRemoved after required processing.

External reuseOnly audited abstracted structure may inform synthetic data.

Intended architecture and controls. Customer instance data is not pooled.

03 / YOUR DECISION

The path to action runs through you.

Evidence arrives at the review gate. Your policies and people decide what may reach your existing applications.

Product design · execution is in developmentExplore the controls
CUSTOMER SECURITY BOUNDARY

The knowledge stays
in your environment.

YOUR VPC / ON-PREMISE
  1. Approved knowledge

    Visible capture and local privacy handling.

  2. Customer specialist

    Train and serve inside your environment.

  3. Review gate

    Your policies determine when a person must decide.

Permitted application action

Raw capturesRemoved after required processing.

External reuseOnly audited abstracted structure may inform synthetic data.

Intended architecture and controls. Customer instance data is not pooled.

CUSTOMER SECURITY BOUNDARY

The knowledge stays
in your environment.

YOUR VPC / ON-PREMISE
  1. Approved knowledge

    Visible capture and local privacy handling.

  2. Customer specialist

    Train and serve inside your environment.

  3. Review gate

    Your policies determine when a person must decide.

Permitted application action

Raw capturesRemoved after required processing.

External reuseOnly audited abstracted structure may inform synthetic data.

Intended architecture and controls. Customer instance data is not pooled.

Explore the controls
RESEARCH & INSIGHTS

The thinking
behind the work.

Explore the ideas, methods and evidence behind Digital Human.

Explore the research
ARCHITECTURE & EVALUATION

The method, written down.

Research frameworks in preparation. Technical paper available under NDA. Capture-and-train method filed in 2026.

FIELD NOTE / 01

The averaging fallacy

Why the best compliant examples matter more than volume.

Read the essay FIELD NOTE / 02

From experiment to scale

Why a good demo is only the start of reliable work.

Read the essay FIELD NOTE / 03

Polanyi and the last automation frontier

Why experience captures what a manual leaves out.

Read the essay
Browse all field notes
THE PEOPLE / NEUROLOGIC AI

Built by people
who know the work.

Operators, scientists and engineers across the USA, Dubai and India. Enterprise experience, model training and product engineering.

Meet Neurologic AI
Leadership Science & engineering New York · Dubai · Bangalore

Start a conversation.

For workflows, technical questions, investment, press or careers. A human reads every message.

Find your contact route
START WITH ONE WORKFLOW.

A small beginning.
A meaningful proof.

Agree the workflow and test.
Target a 60-day pilot after preparation.

60DAY PILOT TARGET
BEFORE KICKOFF

Assessment · access · agreed scope · success measures

THE PILOT01 / 03
15/60
Observe & prepareTarget day · readiness determines the start
01 / DAYS 1–15

Observe & prepare.

Gather approved traces, define the bounded workflow and establish a shared starting point.

Phase output · a scoped workflow and evaluation plan
ONE WORKFLOW / THREE PHASES60-DAY TARGET
BUILD THE FOUNDATIONApproved examples. An agreed test.

The clock starts after readiness. Validation determines what follows.

02 / DAYS 16–40

Train & refine.

Build the specialist from approved examples. Use expert review to refine its decisions and surface mistakes.

Phase output · a specialist ready for validation
ONE WORKFLOW / THREE PHASES60-DAY TARGET
REFINE THE CAPABILITYSpecialist training. Expert feedback.

The clock starts after readiness. Validation determines what follows.

03 / DAYS 41–60

Validate & decide.

Evaluate on held-out work. Review the evidence together and decide whether to refine, expand or stop.

Phase output · evidence for the next decision
ONE WORKFLOW / THREE PHASES60-DAY TARGET
MAKE THE NEXT DECISIONHeld-out evidence. A decision together.

The clock starts after readiness. Validation determines what follows.

ONE WORKFLOW / THREE PHASES60-DAY TARGET
BUILD THE FOUNDATIONApproved examples. An agreed test.

The clock starts after readiness. Validation determines what follows.

Let’s find your first workflow

A pilot target, not a production date.
Timing depends on readiness, complexity and validation.

Editorial imagery and concept scenes are illustrative. Evaluation examples are drawn from the supplied evidence and anonymized.